|
Does x < y mean that x is recessive to y?
I have a quick question. Mostly Saga's list is a list but the genesis furs are listed as a sentence using < or > for dominance. Does fur X < Fur Y mean that Fur X is recessive to Fur Y?
For example:
* Proof on Genesis IV Furs:
Smokey IV < Flame IV < Diamond IV < Domino IV < Coco IV
to me less than means recessive because I see recessive as under but maybe it means dominant to other folks. My logic is not always the same as other people.
Does that mean Smokey IV is recessive to Flame IV is recessive to Diamond IV ... etc?
"In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this." Terry Pratchett
Der Kitty Mill
|
