(09-22-2014 09:54 AM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: AstridSolace, I have to agree with you that your pictures look pretty solid. Your pictures look pretty clear to me that Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.
Picture A, Mom Chocolate Peach has frazzled showing and hides Sassy or something more recessive
Dad Cream Soda has mysterious showing and hides Swanky or something more recessive.
child shows wavy. Wavy is known to be dominant to Swanky so could not come from Dad. Wavy has to be mom's hidden which means Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy. Grandmom Smartie has to have Sassy shown, Wavy hidden.
Picture B, Mom Smartie shows Sassy, Dad Vanilla Ice shows Dreamy. Child shows Wavy. Dreamy is known to be recessive to Wavy so Wavy cannot come from the father. That means Smartie has Sassy shown, Wavy hidden. So again Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.
Good job.
Sagakitty has a 2 proof rule, I think. i don't know if they have to have the 2 proofs by 2 different people. I would send Picture B again to them as it is clearer than picture A.
But if Sassy is already known to be recessive to Boo Boo, then this completely places it as between Boo Boo and Wavy.
Thank you and yes, that's what my thoughts were also. I sent them a notecard saying that i had proofs that sassy was recessive to wavy whiskers, and well the reply was only that this only proves its somewhere between Fussy and Boo Boo which they already knew, and they are looking for information that shows where it places between fussy and boo boo, and if i could find that they would be grateful, so I then resent a week ago and asked they look again, but never heard back. I can only guess it was rejected.
New Sassy whiskers! Post your evidence here!
